There have been some retarded sci-fi movies based on doomsday scenarios. Pretty much all of them are boring, stupid or absolute crap. Armageddon, Deep Impact, The Day After Tomorrow, The Core and probably others I've happily forgotten. The only one I ever cut any slack for was The Core, not because it was any good but because it's Jules Verne's Journey to the Center of the Earth in modern terms.
The latest to add itself to this list is Sunshine. Now, I asked myself why, why, why would someone try to make a movie of what seems the stupidest of all: The sun is going out, so we send a team of scientists to drop a nuke and get it going again! Besides, any Doctor Who fan can tell you the sun isn't going to go out for another 5 billion years.
I figured I was in for another dumbfest. For one thing, I couldn't figure out what legendary kung-fu babe Michelle Yeoh was doing in it -- she plays a botanist with Spanish name Corazon.
It didn't take long into the movie to realize I had terribly misjudged it. It was being intelligent. The characters were intelligent. The dialog was intelligent. Nobody was doing anything stupid. And the most amazing thing of all, this is true Sci-Fi. No aliens, no zombies, no mutating space viruses, no ray guns. Just a pure scientific "what if" and a rational playing out of that premise. Something you only find if you read books. Without the usual gimmicks it manages to tell a story with drama, suspense and even horror.
7 scientists are sent along with all the fissionable material left on the earth to the sun on the chance that what they are doing will save the world. As they get closer to the sun, communication with earth is no longer possible and the story is all about them. This movie in many ways brought up memories of 2001, Silent Running and even Dark Star. I didn't feel it was as dry as those movies but I'm sure some will disagree. I give it 4 toes up. From the same writer and director of 28 Days Later.
It turns out I even had to cut them slack on the premise. There is a theoretical relic of the Big Bang that could theoretically reduce solar fusion.
The latest to add itself to this list is Sunshine. Now, I asked myself why, why, why would someone try to make a movie of what seems the stupidest of all: The sun is going out, so we send a team of scientists to drop a nuke and get it going again! Besides, any Doctor Who fan can tell you the sun isn't going to go out for another 5 billion years.
I figured I was in for another dumbfest. For one thing, I couldn't figure out what legendary kung-fu babe Michelle Yeoh was doing in it -- she plays a botanist with Spanish name Corazon.
It didn't take long into the movie to realize I had terribly misjudged it. It was being intelligent. The characters were intelligent. The dialog was intelligent. Nobody was doing anything stupid. And the most amazing thing of all, this is true Sci-Fi. No aliens, no zombies, no mutating space viruses, no ray guns. Just a pure scientific "what if" and a rational playing out of that premise. Something you only find if you read books. Without the usual gimmicks it manages to tell a story with drama, suspense and even horror.
7 scientists are sent along with all the fissionable material left on the earth to the sun on the chance that what they are doing will save the world. As they get closer to the sun, communication with earth is no longer possible and the story is all about them. This movie in many ways brought up memories of 2001, Silent Running and even Dark Star. I didn't feel it was as dry as those movies but I'm sure some will disagree. I give it 4 toes up. From the same writer and director of 28 Days Later.
It turns out I even had to cut them slack on the premise. There is a theoretical relic of the Big Bang that could theoretically reduce solar fusion.
-
Re: Sunshine
Fri, October 12, 2007 - 8:35 AMOne of many films I'm sorry I missed this summer. Too busy with the details of my life.
-
Re: Sunshine
Fri, October 12, 2007 - 2:59 PMWHAT DO YOU HAVE AGAINST ZOMBIES, YOU SON OF A BITCH
That's Alive-ism, you know. -
-
Re: Sunshine
Fri, October 12, 2007 - 5:49 PMThey don't pay taxes and they are ruining our health care system. They're crap as daylaborers too. -
-
-
Re: Sunshine
Sat, October 13, 2007 - 1:24 AM??? Missed what? This thread? The movie Sunshine is zombie free and the only real sci-fi film in decades. But if it's a shlock crapfest you're looking for may I suggest Rise: Bloodhunter or BloodRayne 2 which makes BloodRayne look like Citizen Kane. -
-
Re: Sunshine
Sat, October 13, 2007 - 8:30 AMThis was probably one of the best, most intellegent and beautiful sci-fi films in years. It's a great story, well acted and profound. The look and effects are unique and the score (by Underworld) is mesmerizing and haunting.
However, the storyline takes a bizarre turn in the last third that makes little sense, has little to do with the main plot and is overblown. It is an unfortunate twist in an otherwise excellent sci-fi film. -
-
Re: Sunshine
Thu, October 25, 2007 - 6:47 PMWith the exception of the plot twist and extra villain towards the end (which was completely unnecessary and stupid), I thought this flick was really good. But I missed the first ten or fifteen mins which really pissed me off. If the film sucked i wouldn't have cared, but it turned out to be good and I am a film snob so i have to experience good works of art in their entirety. -
-
Re: Sunshine
Fri, October 26, 2007 - 12:24 AMI can only imagine that they felt they needed that character to give it some dramaticy cliffhangery type of climax. But I too wish they had spent time come up with an alternative that fit the rest of the movie. Perhaps it was some literal way of saying the divine and the satanic are our creation or something. One thing I found interesting was that very soon into the movie all I cared about were the characters. I couldn't have cared less if the earth died. -
-
Re: Sunshine
Sun, November 18, 2007 - 2:36 PMThis was probably one of the worst, most stupid (as in people who spell words like "intellegent") and superficial sci-fi films in years.
the characters are not established enough so that when things go wrong in act 2 it does not seem like an achilles heel but just sheer stupidity, and that is a lousy plot motivator.
the rest is just psuedo profound rubbish.
utterly vapid. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Sunshine
Mon, November 19, 2007 - 1:21 AMThis web page has a built in spell checker. So, any spelling errors are really typing errors. It sounds like you have a personal flame war going on with someone. Why not take it to private or elsewhere? In the four years I've been here, this tribe has never needed a moderator to step in. It would be nice to keep it that way.
-
-
Re: Sunshine
Mon, November 19, 2007 - 7:32 PM"...very soon into the movie all I cared about were the characters. I couldn't have cared less if the earth died"
Hypno, I hadn't thought about that, but I actually agree. I loved the characters cuz they were all real. Each had realistic motivations for their decisions. But in a way, the film wanted a direct connection between the people and the planet, that hope to save the planet was what drove the individuals to do what they do.
-
Re: Sunshine
Sun, November 25, 2007 - 12:07 PMthat hypno's post is riddled with cliches ("built in spell checker" ..."personal flame war" ... "moderator to step in" ...) shows how some people could appreciate a vacuous movie like this.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-